Free tool
Is this worth automating?
Most routine work isn’t worth a custom build — and the tasks people complain about loudest often aren’t the best ones to automate. This is the rough test we actually use to tell a good candidate from a tempting dead end.
Answer a few questions about the task. You’ll get an honest read and a rough sense of the time it’s costing. Nothing is sent anywhere — it all runs in your browser.
How many hours a week does it eat?
Total time across whoever touches it — a rough number is fine.
How much of that is routine, vs judgment?
The repetitive part is what's safe to hand off; the judgment stays with a person.
How often does it happen?
Roughly what's an hour of that person's time worth?
Loaded cost — wages plus the work they're not doing instead.
Can a person review the result before it matters?
If it goes wrong, how costly is the mistake?
The read
Worth a closer look
Time currently going into the routine part
~115 hrs/yr
≈ $8,600 of time a year
The ceiling on what’s recoverable — not a promised saving. It’s the time the routine part is costing you now.
- It happens often enough that any time saved compounds week over week.
- Most of it is routine, which is exactly the part that's safe to hand off while a person keeps the judgment.
A rough first read, not a quote — and nothing here leaves your browser. The honest version is a short conversation. Tell us what’s eating your time →
Got a strong candidate?
Tell us about it. The first call’s free — 30 minutes, no pitch — and we’ll tell you honestly whether it’s worth building.